Parties Involved in the DC Nursing Home Abuse Trial Process

The nursing home abuse trial process begins when allegations are made. Before filing a claim on behalf of your loved one, it could be critical to comprehend the role of the parties involved in the DC nursing home abuse trial process.

A lawyer could then try proving the injuries that were suffered as a result, as well as the length of time the individual was subject to the neglect or abuse. A driven nursing home neglect attorney could try to prove neglect throughout the trial by demonstrating liability, medical causation, and the amplitude of damages.

What is the Nursing Home Abuse Trial Process?

The varying parties involved in the DC nursing home abuse trial process depend on the facts of the case. However, most nursing home abuse trials tend to follow a similar pattern. After opening statements, the plaintiff presents their case. After that, the defendant presents their case-in-chief, followed by summations.

If there was a pattern of conduct by a nursing home showing mental abuse that that claim could be brought together by multiple plaintiffs. The more plaintiffs or defendants there are, the longer the case will take. In cases of multiple defendants, they often end up pointing fingers at each other.

Dynamics of Multiple Defendants in Nursing Home Abuse Cases

Where there are multiple defendants the dynamic of the trial will be a little different. If there is a plaintiff claiming that they told the nursing home administrator repeatedly that an employee was harassing them and the administrator failed to act, that will lead to different defenses. The employee will defend the allegations of sexual abuse, while the administrator will claim they had no knowledge of the situation.

What is the Role of the Jury in an Assisted Living Abuse Case?

The parties involved in the DC nursing home abuse trial process do not just imply those involved in the case, but also those who will be judging the outcome. Nursing home abuse trials are usually jury trials. One can elect not to have a jury, however, juries can relate to the fact that a loved one is not being treated well. If the jury can picture their own loved ones in that position, they are more apt to award a large sum of damages. Judges are typically more objective and thorough in applying the facts under the circumstances of the case.

Jury Selection Process

In DC, the jury selection process is called judge-led voir dire. The judge actually talks to potential jurors and they sit six jurors as well as anywhere from two to four alternates. The judge will talk to each juror about whether or not their personal experiences and whether, given the facts of the case, they have any bias that prevents them from being fair and impartial in weighing the evidence presented to them.

Lawyers can use what are called peremptory challenges during this process. This means they can eliminate three people from the jury pool for any non-discriminatory reason. Lawyers can also make for cause challenges when they believe a potential juror has some sort of bias. The judge can determine whether the bias would prevent them from being fair and reasonable under the circumstances in weighing the evidence impartially and unbiasedly.

How a Lawyer Could Help

Trusted lawyers are critical parties involved in the DC nursing home abuse trial process. Attorneys take pride in providing some measure of relief to a family when their loved one has been a victim of nursing home abuse. Obtaining a reward for someone who truly felt helpless and unable to provide the proper care for their loved one is very gratifying.